The impossibility of evolution

The following pages have been critical of the so lightly assumed by many theory apart, life is more or less evolved by chance through evolution. These are questions based on our science can not provide answers.

For example, why our brain can think the only institution about themselves or how is it possible that the six inanimate basic building blocks of our body ( carbon, hydrogen , oxygen, nitrogen , sulfur, phosphorus) suddenly have an awareness in the correct arrangement . Even some of the most astonishing miracles in our nature clearly show that from a scientific point of view , is completely exclude based on random processes origin of life. This truth recognized after more than 60 years, the once atheist writer and philosopher Malcolm Muggeridge, who it like this put it: "I am convinced that the theory of evolution , especially the extent to which it is applied , as one of the biggest jokes in the history books the future arrives. posterity will be surprised how such a weak and dubious hypothesis could be so incredibly recklessly accepted. "

In order to disprove the theory of the origin of life through evolution, it is useless merely to present arguments against various inconsistencies. Ultimately remain evolutionists and evolutionary critics in this type of discussion always in a stalemate . But if a natural law annuls the thought system of evolution already at the root , all secondary , laborious pro / contra discussions unnecessary. Because the laws of nature know no exceptions , they always apply , in any place , at any time , throughout the universe. And so there's always been the strongest argument in science through natural laws . So we now know , for example, everyone that a perpetual motion machine ,  a machine that runs continuously without energy supply , an impossible machine , since the energy conservation law forbids plain and simple.

Bu Haber için yorum yapabilirsiniz 14.01.2014 00:46:40 204.236.235.245

Yorumlar()